<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ethics of Using Ad-Blocking Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andydidyk.com/2009/05/29/the-ethics-of-using-ad-blocking-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andydidyk.com/2009/05/29/the-ethics-of-using-ad-blocking-software/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on advertising, marketing, branding, and consumerism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Didyk</title>
		<link>http://www.andydidyk.com/2009/05/29/the-ethics-of-using-ad-blocking-software/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Didyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andydidyk.com/?p=372#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I think your point about annoying or irrelevant ads is well taken.  That&#039;s one of my primary motivators for continuing to block the ridiculous number of ads on sites like weather.com and cnn.com.  

I love the concept of opt-in marketing, and I subscribe to a number of ads and messages from retailers that are relevant to me or that carry great deals.

I guess my thoughts are more towards sites that carry pure content that is written by someone, rather than a product site.  Sometimes, I&#039;m surprised by a good ad and may even click on it.  But more importantly, disabling ad-blocker is the only way I can monetarily support the efforts of someone or a company that I believe to be valuable to me.  

Thanks for the thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your point about annoying or irrelevant ads is well taken.  That&#8217;s one of my primary motivators for continuing to block the ridiculous number of ads on sites like weather.com and cnn.com.  </p>
<p>I love the concept of opt-in marketing, and I subscribe to a number of ads and messages from retailers that are relevant to me or that carry great deals.</p>
<p>I guess my thoughts are more towards sites that carry pure content that is written by someone, rather than a product site.  Sometimes, I&#8217;m surprised by a good ad and may even click on it.  But more importantly, disabling ad-blocker is the only way I can monetarily support the efforts of someone or a company that I believe to be valuable to me.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.andydidyk.com/2009/05/29/the-ethics-of-using-ad-blocking-software/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andydidyk.com/?p=372#comment-341</guid>
		<description>For me, it&#039;s a matter of coming to terms w/ the fact that traditional interruption advertising is slowly but surely being replaced by marketing models that allow you to &quot;opt-in&quot;. If something is truly relevant to me AND helps me in some way, I&#039;m not opposed to receiving the message. 

When given the opportunity to skip or block ads, an astounding # of people do so because they are completely irrelevant or distracting. That should not be ignored. If you ignore it, you&#039;re not listening to your prospects.

Something like a good ole email newsletter has a greater power of persuasion because it&#039;s offers value and I subscribe. If it continues to be valuable over time, it builds trust w/ me and I&#039;ll pay attention to their other products &amp; services sooner or later--as long as it&#039;s done tastefully and not overwhelming in frequency. 

Ad Words aren&#039;t too bad because they don&#039;t stop you from what you were doing or get in the way. 

I say use ad blocker on every site and accelerate the transition to permission based marketing. It enhances your experience and forces advertisers to respect your time &amp; attention to remain competitive. 

Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, it&#8217;s a matter of coming to terms w/ the fact that traditional interruption advertising is slowly but surely being replaced by marketing models that allow you to &#8220;opt-in&#8221;. If something is truly relevant to me AND helps me in some way, I&#8217;m not opposed to receiving the message. </p>
<p>When given the opportunity to skip or block ads, an astounding # of people do so because they are completely irrelevant or distracting. That should not be ignored. If you ignore it, you&#8217;re not listening to your prospects.</p>
<p>Something like a good ole email newsletter has a greater power of persuasion because it&#8217;s offers value and I subscribe. If it continues to be valuable over time, it builds trust w/ me and I&#8217;ll pay attention to their other products &amp; services sooner or later&#8211;as long as it&#8217;s done tastefully and not overwhelming in frequency. </p>
<p>Ad Words aren&#8217;t too bad because they don&#8217;t stop you from what you were doing or get in the way. </p>
<p>I say use ad blocker on every site and accelerate the transition to permission based marketing. It enhances your experience and forces advertisers to respect your time &amp; attention to remain competitive. </p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

